Timetable
-
13 February 2012
Consultation Paper released and call for submissions
-
5 April 2012
Deadline for submissions for those wanting to present in person to the Commission. Submissions must be lodged with the Commission by midnight on 5 April.
-
24 April - 18 May 2012
Presentation of submissions (public hearings) take place
-
31 May 2012
Deadline for all other submissions
-
June - July 2012
Consideration and development of possible proposals for changes to MMP voting system
-
13 August 2012
Proposal Paper released and call for submissions
-
7 September 2012
Submissions close on Proposal Paper
-
24 September 2012
Submissions and summary of submissions received on proposals available at www.mmpreview.org.nz or by calling 0800 36 76 56
-
31 October 2012
Final report presented to Minister of Justice
The Issues Being Reviewed
Why the review
In the 2011 Referendum on the Voting System, held in conjunction with the General Election on 26 November, the majority of voters chose to keep MMP as New Zealand's voting system.
This triggered an independent review of MMP, conducted by the Electoral Commission, in which people were able to have a say on any changes they wanted made to the way MMP works.
The review built on the reforms to our electoral system that began in 1986 with the report of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System (Towards a Better Democracy) and the subsequent referenda in 1992 and 1993 where New Zealanders voted to change the way we vote, and chose MMP as the voting system.
-
What was reviewed?
The review had to include a number of issues that were decided by Parliament. These were—
- The 5 percent party vote threshold for a party to be eligible for allocation of list seats;
- The one electorate seat threshold for a party to be eligible for allocation of list seats;
- The effects of population change on the ratio of electorate seats to list seats;
- The effect of a party’s candidates winning more seats than the party would be entitled;
- The capacity of a person to be both a constituency candidate and a list candidate;
- A party’s ability to determine the order of candidates on its party list and the inability of voters to rank list candidates in order of preference;
- The capacity of a list MP to stand as a candidate in a by-election;
Two issues were not part of the MMP review. The size of Parliament and Māori representation were not reviewed, but the Commission was able to consider any other aspects of the MMP voting system, as long as they related directly to the way MMP works.
-
How did it work?
The purpose of the review was to recommend changes to the way MMP works, and to give everybody the chance to have their say on changes they wanted made to the MMP voting system.
The first stage of the public consultation period ended in May. The Electoral Commission received over 4,600 submissions and held public hearings in Auckland, Christchurch, Hamilton, and Wellington to hear from those people who wanted to present their submissions in person.
Drawing on the information and material presented in submissions and advice received, the Commission then developed a number of proposals. These were released as a Proposals Paper on 13 August, with an invitation to the public to again provide written comments on them. Over 1,000 thousand submissions were received on the Proposals Paper.
A final report with the Commission's recommendations was presented to the Minister of Justice on 29 October 2012. Read the report here.
-
Timetable for the review
Date What Happened 13 February 2012 Consultation Paper released and call for submissions 5 April 2012 Deadline for submissions for those wanting to present in person to the Commission. 24 April - 18 May 2012 Presentation of submissions (public hearings) take place 31 May 2012 Deadline for all submissions June - July 2012 Consideration and development of possible proposals for changes to MMP voting system 13 August 2012 Proposal Paper released and call for submissions 7 September 2012 Submissions close on Proposal Paper 31 October 2012 Final report presented to Minister of Justice -
What happens now?
The Commission presented its final report to the Minister of Justice on 29 October 2012 with recommendations for change.
As soon as practicable after receiving the report, the Minister must present a copy of it to Parliament.
Parliament will decide what to do with the Commission’s recommendations.
-
Submissions now closed
Submissions have now closed. You can read what others have said here.
-
About MMP
This is the system we use to elect our Parliament.There are 120 Members of Parliament (MPs). There are 70 electorates, including the Māori electorates. Each elects one MP, called an Electorate MP. The other 50 MPs are elected from political party lists and are called List MPs.
Each voter gets two votes.
The first vote is for the political party the voter chooses. This is called the party vote and largely decides the total number of seats each political party gets in Parliament.
The second vote is to choose the MP the voter wants to represent the electorate they live in. This is called the electorate vote. The candidate who gets the most votes wins. They do not have to get more than half the votes.
MMP in Detail
This is the system we use to elect our Parliament. It is based on a Parliament with 120 MPs.
Types of MPs?
There are two types of MPs – those elected from electorates and those elected from party lists.
The country is divided into 70 electorates, each electing one MP. They are called Electorate MPs and currently represent
- 16 South Island general electorates
- 47 North Island general electorates
- 7 Māori electorates
The other MPs in Parliament are elected from political party lists and are called List MPs.
How do people vote?
Each voter has two votes.
The first vote is for the political party the voter chooses. This is called the party vote. Voters put a tick
next to the name of the party for which they wish to vote.Each political party’s share of all the seats in Parliament is about the same as its share of the party vote.
The second vote is called the electorate vote and is used to choose the Electorate MP the voter wants to represent the electorate they live in. Voters put a tick
next to the name of the candidate for whom they wish to vote. The candidate who gets the most votes wins. They do not have to get more than half the votes.Here is an example of an MMP ballot paper:
How are MPs elected?
Under current MMP rules, a political party is entitled to a share of MPs that’s about the same as its share of the party vote if it reaches one of two thresholds (sometimes called clearing one of two "hurdles"). To meet these thresholds or hurdles, a political party must win:
- EITHER at least 5% of the nation-wide party vote;
- OR at least one electorate seat.
A formula – called the Sainte-Laguё formula – is used to determine the total number of seats each party is entitled to in Parliament (more details about how the formula works can be found at http://www.elections.org.nz/voting/mmp/sainte-lague.html).
A political party’s total number of seats in Parliament is filled with a mix of Electorate MPs and List MPs.
The Electorate MPs are elected using the First Past the Post voting system (FPP). The candidate who gets the most votes wins. The winning candidate does not have to get more than half the votes.
The rest of a party’s MPs are elected from the party’s list. The number of List MPs each party receives is the difference between a party’s total allocation of seats in Parliament and its number of Electorate MPs.
For example, if a party gets 30% of the party vote it will get about 36 MPs in Parliament (being 30% of 120 seats). So if that party wins 20 electorate seats it will have 16 List MPs in addition to its 20 Electorate MPs.
If a party crosses the 5% party vote threshold but, at the same time, wins no electorate seats, it is still entitled to a share of all the seats in Parliament. For example, if a party wins 10% of the party votes and no electorate seats, all its 12 MPs (10% of 120) will be List MPs elected from the party list in the order they are ranked by the party.
Sometimes a party's share of the party vote entitles it to a number of seats in Parliament that is smaller than the number of its Electorate MPs. When this happens that party will neither have electorate seats taken away from it, nor be allocated any List MPs. Instead, for the life of the Parliament concerned there will be more than 120 MPs in Parliament. This is called an overhang and has happened three times: from 2005-08 there were 121 MPs, in the 2008-11 Parliament there were 122 MPs, and in the current Parliament there are 121 MPs.
What does Parliament look like?
MMP is classified as a proportional representation voting system. This is because the overall result closely mirrors the party vote.
The share of seats a political party wins in Parliament is about the same as its share of the party vote. This applies both to big parties and to small parties if they qualify for a share of the seats in Parliament by achieving one of the two thresholds.
The main features of MMP are illustrated in the results of the 2005 and 2008 Parliamentary elections in New Zealand.

In 2005, all the parties that qualified for seats in Parliament won a share of the seats that was about the same as their share of the party votes. For example, the Labour Party won 41.1% of the party votes and 41.3% of the seats in Parliament. Likewise, the New Zealand First party won 5.7% of the party votes in 2005 and 5.8% of the seats in Parliament.
In 2008, many of the parties represented in Parliament had a slightly higher share of the seats than their share of the nation-wide party votes. This was partly because the party that won the fourth-highest share of the party votes (New Zealand First) failed to reach either the 5% party-vote threshold or the one-seat threshold and thus won no seats in Parliament. In 2008 the Green Party did not win any electorates seats. However, because the Green Party (with 6.7% of the party votes) had cleared the 5% party-vote threshold, it was entitled to 9 List seats – 7.4% of all the seats in Parliament.

What type of government is usually formed?
Under MMP, coalitions or agreements between political parties are usually needed before Governments can be formed.
For example, after the 2005 election in New Zealand, the largest party in Parliament – Labour – formed a government after signing a coalition agreement with the Progressive Party and signing "confidence and supply" agreements with the New Zealand First and United Future parties. Similarly, after the 2008 election the largest party in Parliament – National – formed a government after negotiating "confidence and supply" agreements with the ACT, Māori and United Future parties.
Where is MMP used?
MMP has been used for parliamentary elections in New Zealand since 1996. It has been used for federal parliamentary elections in Germany for more than sixty years. MMP is also used for elections to all the state parliaments in Germany, as well as for elections to the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly.
What are other names for Mixed Member Proportional (MMP)?
In the United Kingdom, MMP is sometimes known as AMS (which stands for Additional Member System) . Political scientists have classified MMP as an example of a two-tier compensatory proportional representation voting system.
